Dealer Lead Conversion Experience

Client Autohome
Role Experience & Product Design
Industry Automotive
Year 2025

A Q3 growth-design initiative spanning dealer listings, smart storefronts, CPS and IM. I explored 12 new ideas, prioritized two high-ROI concepts, and iterated AI-assisted inquiry and multi-store price comparison from early hypotheses to launch-ready solutions.

01

Background

Background summary: Q3 design goal — drive fixes for critical issues already online, while exploring new ideas capable of improving business metrics.

Business scope: Dealer lead-conversion entry points, smart storefronts for contracted dealers, CPS new-car sale pages, and IM.

Optimization goal: Increase lead volume and support dealer-store renewals.

02

Execution strategy

For live experiences: Converge on P0 issues and drive resolution by following implementation across each business line.

For new ideas: Map the needs and costs of users, the platform, and dealers to identify opportunities that can move business metrics.

03

Design exploration

We brainstormed around different user priorities and produced 12 new concepts and 5 live-experience improvements.

Many of the new concepts focused on AI improvements for Smart Storefronts, suggesting a possible comprehensive AI upgrade for Smart Storefronts.

Internal alignment feedback:

Smart Storefronts receive less page traffic than Dealer Hub, and an AI upgrade for Smart Storefronts could conflict with the platform-level AI strategy. We therefore prioritized features that could be implemented in Dealer Hub.

Initial conclusion:

Among the 12 new concepts, we selected 2 functions with relatively strong expected ROI. They share the following characteristics:

  1. They do not affect existing traffic entry points and are triggered only under specific conditions.
  2. They retain users who may otherwise leave.
  3. They remain relatively independent and are expected to have comparatively low implementation costs.
  4. They package existing business capabilities into new functions that solve real problems in the product experience.

Selected concepts

Function 1: AI-assisted inquiry

Introduction: When a user is about to leave because they fear being disturbed, AI can call dealers on their behalf and collect the information they need. After confirming that a dealer's information meets their expectations, the user can choose whether to share personal information with the dealer.

Function 2: Price comparison

Introduction: Research showed that users on second-hand marketplaces can take Dealer A's quote to Dealer B to negotiate a lower price. We therefore considered adding a similar capability to the original quote-results page, encouraging users to compare prices and share their personal information with more dealers.

04

Focused iteration

AI-assisted inquiry

V1 · Initial flow

  • Trigger: After the user exits the consent dialog from the inquiry button.
  • Before submission: Use motion, a headline and capability tags to communicate the AI service.
  • After submission: Simulate a real calling process in conversation form and recommend dealers by distance, price and sales.
Interactive prototype

V2 · Rethink the result page

Direction 1: Combine an AI persona with a summary and concise dealer recommendations.Direction 2: Embed the summary into the conversation and expose more shortcuts. The remaining issue was weak motivation to submit contact details afterward.

Interactive prototype
Interactive prototype

V3 · Shift the value proposition

Value proposition: Shift from harassment-free inquiry to multi-store price comparison.Interaction: Retain authorization before information is shown.

Interactive prototype

V4 · Update the interaction model

A comparison table with partially hidden information made the multi-store value tangible and created a clearer reason to unlock the complete result.

Interactive prototype

Price comparison

V1 · Initial directions

Direction 1: Use an informational entry and bottom sheet with configurable dealers.Direction 2: Expose dealer cards and move the negotiation into IM. Review showed that both began after conversion, while the higher-value opportunity was to recover users who had not converted.

Interactive prototype
Interactive prototype

V2 · Change the comparison baseline

The proposal shifted to a market-average baseline, filtering dealers priced below average and using that value to motivate users to unlock the result.

Interactive prototype
05

Product review

AI-assisted inquiry → Multi-store comparison

The product team approved the direction for further refinement and also recommended continuing the original AI-assisted inquiry concept in parallel.

Bring-a-price comparison → Below-average dealers

The direction was paused because business lines could not share the data needed to calculate a market average, and most dealer preset prices were identical.
06

Final solution

AI-assisted inquiry

  • Replace the original conditional trigger with a persistent bottom entry configured by user profile.
  • Reuse the existing result page and prevent negative impact on downstream conversion.
Interactive prototype
Interactive prototype

Multi-store comparison

  • Add a permanent entry in addition to condition-triggered exposure.
  • Reuse the existing result page while protecting conversion in the modules below.
Interactive prototype
07

Results

AI-assisted inquiry

Entry click-through rose from 3.51% to 5.12%, while authorization click-through rose from 5.49% to 15.81%—a relative increase of about 188% and the most significant gain from this optimization. The successful lead-submission rate remained high at 93.74%, with positive overall conversion.

Multi-store comparison

Entry click-through reached 31.47%, and 96.20% of users reached the comparison view. The unlock click-through rate was 8.10%, approximately 35%–62% higher than the 5%–6% rate on similar pages, indicating a clear positive effect on lead conversion.

Feedback